| Title | The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Mediæval Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides’ Response to the Question of Eternity |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | The Maghreb Review |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 289-307 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Maimonides, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | S. M. Hadi Gerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The study aims to show how taking history and perspective into consideration could help in understanding mediæval philosophy. To that end, in spite of a philosophical assumption which usually considers that there is no connection between eternity and creation, the paper assumes that Maimonides planned to establish a distinct response which was neither creation nor eternity. Investigating Maimonides’ perspective will be approached in two ways. Firstly, through the distinction between Maimonides, on one hand and theologians and philosophers on the other will be discussed from an intellectual point of view. Al-Ghazālī will be compared to Maimonides to show that, despite initial impressions, they differ substantially from each other on this issue. It will also be shown how Maimonides differentiated his discourse from that of the Greek philosophers. It will firstly be shown here that Maimonides’ response to the question of eternity adopts a different position from that of the classical theologians and the ancient philosophers. Secondly, the historicity of Maimonides’ discourse, or whether anyone else shared Maimonides’ conciliatory approach, will be examined. It will be shown that Averroes has the highest affinity with Maimonides in this regard. This will result in recognition of the fact that Maimonides’ “conciliatory approach” was shared with some other mediæval philosophers such as Averroes. Ultimately, it will be explained how Maimonides’ complicated concept of eternity can be better understood and justified if one takes perspective and historical discourse into consideration, showing that he was someone who tried to incorporate “conciliatory discourse” into mediæval philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5604","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5604,"authors_free":[{"id":6505,"entry_id":5604,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"S. M. Hadi Gerami","free_first_name":"S. M. Hadi ","free_last_name":" Gerami","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Medi\u00e6val Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides\u2019 Response to the Question of Eternity","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Importance of History and Perspective in Understanding Medi\u00e6val Philosophy: The Case of Maimonides\u2019 Response to the Question of Eternity"},"abstract":"The study aims to show how taking history and perspective into consideration could help in understanding medi\u00e6val philosophy. To that end, in spite of a philosophical assumption which usually considers that there is no connection between eternity and creation, the paper assumes that Maimonides planned to establish a distinct response which was neither creation nor eternity. Investigating Maimonides\u2019 perspective will be approached in two ways. Firstly, through the distinction between Maimonides, on one hand and theologians and philosophers on the other will be discussed from an intellectual point of view. Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b will be compared to Maimonides to show that, despite initial impressions, they differ substantially from each other on this issue. It will also be shown how Maimonides differentiated his discourse from that of the Greek philosophers. It will firstly be shown here that Maimonides\u2019 response to the question of eternity adopts a different position from that of the classical theologians and the ancient philosophers. Secondly, the historicity of Maimonides\u2019 discourse, or whether anyone else shared Maimonides\u2019 conciliatory approach, will be examined. It will be shown that Averroes has the highest affinity with Maimonides in this regard. This will result in recognition of the fact that Maimonides\u2019 \u201cconciliatory approach\u201d was shared with some other medi\u00e6val philosophers such as Averroes. Ultimately, it will be explained how Maimonides\u2019 complicated concept of eternity can be better understood and justified if one takes perspective and historical discourse into consideration, showing that he was someone who tried to incorporate \u201cconciliatory discourse\u201d into medi\u00e6val philosophy.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1353\/tmr.2015.0029","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5604,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Maghreb Review","volume":"40","issue":"3","pages":"289-307"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Averroës' Takfir of al-Ghazālī: Ta'wīl and Causal Kufr |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | American journal of Islam and society |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 60-92 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Saja Parvizian |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Ghazālı̄ famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroës claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghazālı̄ is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroës’ legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroës’ argument is that al-Ghazālı̄ has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people’s unbelief, al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever as well. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5566","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5566,"authors_free":[{"id":6460,"entry_id":5566,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saja Parvizian","free_first_name":"Saja ","free_last_name":"Parvizian","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr"},"abstract":"Al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroe\u0308s claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 argument is that al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people\u2019s unbelief, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever as well.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35632\/ajis.v38i1-2.735","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5566,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American journal of Islam and society","volume":"38","issue":"1\/2","pages":"60-92"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | The Pilgrimage of Philosophy. A Festschrift for Charles E. Butterworth |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | South Bend, IN |
| Publisher | St. Augustine’s Press |
| Categories | Politics, Theology, al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | René M. Paddags , Waseem El-Rayes , Gregory A. McBrayer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book intends to introduce readers to the work of Charles E. Butterworth, and thereby to introduce students to Medieval islamic political philosophy, of which Butterworth is one of the world's most prominent scholars. In a wider sense, the Festschrift introduces its readers to the current debates on Medieval islamic political philosophy, related as they are to the questions of the relationship between islam and Christianity, the Medieval to the Modern world, and reason and revelation. Butterworth's scholarship spans six decades, primarily translating, editing, and interpreting the works of the Muslim political philosopher Alfarabi (d. 950) and Averroes (Ibn Rushd, d. 1198). He began his studies of Muslim political philosophy at a time when the Middle East and islam did not have the political salience they have acquired in more recent years. instead, Butterworth&;s reason for engaging with islam was rooted in the question of the relationship between reason and revelation. While one possible answer was pursued in the Christian, latin West, the islamic borderlands of Greek, Roman, and Muslim civilization offered another. By exploring Averroes, who provides the possibility of an Aristotelian-Islamic political philosophy, and Alfarabi, who pursues a Platonic-islamic political philosophy, Butterworth showed how islamic civilization provided a viable alternative to the theologico-political question reason v revelation, as well as serving as an inspiration to the latin West. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5088","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5088,"authors_free":[{"id":5855,"entry_id":5088,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ren\u00e9 M. Paddags","free_first_name":"Ren\u00e9 M. ","free_last_name":"Paddags","norm_person":null},{"id":5856,"entry_id":5088,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Waseem El-Rayes ","free_first_name":"Waseem ","free_last_name":"El-Rayes ","norm_person":null},{"id":5857,"entry_id":5088,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Gregory A. McBrayer","free_first_name":"Gregory ","free_last_name":"McBrayer","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Pilgrimage of Philosophy. A Festschrift for Charles E. Butterworth","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Pilgrimage of Philosophy. A Festschrift for Charles E. Butterworth"},"abstract":"This book intends to introduce readers to the work of Charles E. Butterworth, and thereby to introduce students to Medieval islamic political philosophy, of which Butterworth is one of the world's most prominent scholars. In a wider sense, the Festschrift introduces its readers to the current debates on Medieval islamic political philosophy, related as they are to the questions of the relationship between islam and Christianity, the Medieval to the Modern world, and reason and revelation. Butterworth's scholarship spans six decades, primarily translating, editing, and interpreting the works of the Muslim political philosopher Alfarabi (d. 950) and Averroes (Ibn Rushd, d. 1198). He began his studies of Muslim political philosophy at a time when the Middle East and islam did not have the political salience they have acquired in more recent years. instead, Butterworth&;s reason for engaging with islam was rooted in the question of the relationship between reason and revelation.\r\n\r\nWhile one possible answer was pursued in the Christian, latin West, the islamic borderlands of Greek, Roman, and Muslim civilization offered another. By exploring Averroes, who provides the possibility of an Aristotelian-Islamic political philosophy, and Alfarabi, who pursues a Platonic-islamic political philosophy, Butterworth showed how islamic civilization provided a viable alternative to the theologico-political question reason v revelation, as well as serving as an inspiration to the latin West.","btype":4,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5088,"pubplace":"South Bend, IN","publisher":"St. Augustine\u2019s Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teoría de Dios en el “Tahâfut” |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | La filosofía en Al Ándalus |
| Pages | 453–464 |
| Categories | Theology, al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Roger Arnaldez |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5187","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5187,"authors_free":[{"id":5976,"entry_id":5187,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1021,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roger Arnaldez","free_first_name":"Roger","free_last_name":"Arnaldez","norm_person":{"id":1021,"first_name":"Roger","last_name":"Arnaldez","full_name":"Roger Arnaldez","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1029497893","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51684989","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1029497893.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roger Arnaldez"}}],"entry_title":"El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teor\u00eda de Dios en el \u201cTah\u00e2fut\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teor\u00eda de Dios en el \u201cTah\u00e2fut\u201d"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1021,"full_name":"Roger Arnaldez","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5187,"section_of":5181,"pages":"453\u2013464","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5181,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"es","title":"La filosof\u00eda en Al \u00c1ndalus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"La presente obra ofrece una perspectiva abierta de la filosof\u00eda de al-Andalus con enfoques diversos y complementarios a cargo de reconocidos especialistas del arabismo, el hebra\u00edsmo y el pensamiento medieval: Miguel As\u00edn Palacios, Manuel Alonso, Roger Arnaldez, Miguel Cruz Hern\u00e1ndez, Fernando D\u00edaz Esteban, Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales, David Gonzalo Maeso, Joaqu\u00edn Lomba, Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca y Juan Vernet. Novedad importante que reflejan estas p\u00e1ginas es la integraci\u00f3n de los fil\u00f3sofos jud\u00edos y musulmanes en la casa com\u00fan de al-Andalus, como hist\u00f3ricamente aconteci\u00f3. En la primera parte se analizan las influencias cl\u00e1sicas y orientales que confluyeron en la vida intelectual de la Espa\u00f1a musulmana. En la segunda se traza un amplio y detallado panorama de los principales fil\u00f3sofos de al-Andalus. El editor ha reconstruido en la introducci\u00f3n el desarrollo del pensamiento andalus\u00ed dentro de su contexto hist\u00f3rico. Rigor hist\u00f3rico-filol\u00f3gico, contextualizaci\u00f3n social, profundizaci\u00f3n en las cuestiones especulativas y esp\u00edritu cr\u00edtico constituyen rasgos comunes de estos ensayos. Esta nueva edici\u00f3n se ampl\u00eda con un pr\u00f3logo que resume las ediciones y estudios producidos en Espa\u00f1a durante el \u00faltimo cuarto de siglo; una renovada bibliograf\u00eda b\u00e1sica acerca de las fuentes hist\u00f3ricas y literarias; y una actualizada nota biobibliogr\u00e1fica de los autores aqu\u00ed reunidos que ser\u00e1 \u00fatil a los j\u00f3venes lectores e investigadores. Cierra el libro un Ap\u00e9ndice con tres nuevos textos: un art\u00edculo del historiador de la ciencia \u00e1rabe Juan Vernet, una lograda entrevista al sabio egipcio Mahmud Ali Makki y un reciente trabajo del profesor Mart\u00ednez Lorca sobre la formaci\u00f3n de la cultura andalus\u00ed y su posterior recepci\u00f3n en la Europa latina.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5181,"pubplace":"C\u00f3rdoba","publisher":"Almuzara","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | The philosophers strike back: Averroes and islamic philosophy after al-Ghazali |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | Analytic Islamic philosophy |
| Pages | 143-169 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Anthony Robert Booth |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5477","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5477,"authors_free":[{"id":6351,"entry_id":5477,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1823,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Robert Booth ","free_first_name":"Anthony Robert ","free_last_name":"Booth","norm_person":{"id":1823,"first_name":"Anthony Robert ","last_name":"Booth","full_name":"Anthony Robert Booth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128440318","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Anthony Robert Booth"}}],"entry_title":"The philosophers strike back: Averroes and islamic philosophy after al-Ghazali","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The philosophers strike back: Averroes and islamic philosophy after al-Ghazali"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1823,"full_name":"Anthony Robert Booth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5477,"section_of":5478,"pages":"143-169","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5478,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Analytic Islamic philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This book is an introduction to Islamic Philosophy, beginning with its Medieval inception, right through to its more contemporary incarnations. Using the language and conceptual apparatus of contemporary Anglo-American 'Analytic' philosophy, this book represents a novel and creative attempt to rejuvenate Islamic Philosophy for a modern audience. It adopts a 'rational reconstructive' approach to the history of philosophy by affording maximum hermeneutical priority to the strongest possible interpretation of a philosopher's arguments while also paying attention to the historical context in which they worked. The central canonical figures of Medieval Islamic Philosophy - al-Kindi, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Averroes - are presented chronologically along with an introduction to the central themes of Islamic theology and the Greek philosophical tradition they inherited. The book then briefly introduces what the author collectively refers to as the 'Pre-Modern' figures including Suhrawardi, Mulla Sadra, and Ibn Taymiyyah, and presents all of these thinkers, along with their Medieval predecessors, as forerunners to the more modern incarnation of Islamic Philosophy: Political Islam.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5478,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Palgrave Macmillan","series":"Palgrave philosophy today","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6352,"entry_id":5478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1823,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Robert Booth","free_first_name":"Anthony Robert","free_last_name":"Booth","norm_person":{"id":1823,"first_name":"Anthony Robert ","last_name":"Booth","full_name":"Anthony Robert Booth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128440318","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazâlî. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1 |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies |
| Volume | 94 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Georges Tamer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume offers an account of Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1111) as a rational theologian who created a symbiosis of philosophy and theology and infused rationality into Sufism. The majority of the papers herein deal with important topics of al-Ghazālī’s work, which demonstrate his rational treatment of the Qurʾān and major subjects of Islamic theology and everyday life of Muslims. Some other contributions address al-Ghazālī’s sources and how his intellectual endeavors were later received by scholars who had the same concern of reconciling religion and rationality within Islam, Christianity and Judaism. With contributions by Binyamin Abrahamov, Hans Daiber, Ken Garden, Avner Giladi, Scott Girdner, Frank Griffel, Steven Harvey, Alfred Ivry, Jules Janssens, Taneli Kukkonen, Luis Xavier López-Farjeat, Wilferd Madelung, Yahya M. Michot, Yasien Mohamed, Eric Ormsby, M. Sait Özervarlı, and Hidemi Takahashi. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5286","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5286,"authors_free":[{"id":6105,"entry_id":5286,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":861,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Georges Tamer","free_first_name":"Georges","free_last_name":"Tamer","norm_person":{"id":861,"first_name":"Georges","last_name":"Tamer","full_name":"Georges Tamer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1056157437","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59259868","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Georges Tamer"}}],"entry_title":"Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1"},"abstract":"This volume offers an account of Ab\u016b \u1e24\u0101mid al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b (d. 505\/1111) as a rational theologian who created a symbiosis of philosophy and theology and infused rationality into Sufism. The majority of the papers herein deal with important topics of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s work, which demonstrate his rational treatment of the Qur\u02be\u0101n and major subjects of Islamic theology and everyday life of Muslims. Some other contributions address al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s sources and how his intellectual endeavors were later received by scholars who had the same concern of reconciling religion and rationality within Islam, Christianity and Judaism.\r\n\r\nWith contributions by Binyamin Abrahamov, Hans Daiber, Ken Garden, Avner Giladi, Scott Girdner, Frank Griffel, Steven Harvey, Alfred Ivry, Jules Janssens, Taneli Kukkonen, Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat, Wilferd Madelung, Yahya M. Michot, Yasien Mohamed, Eric Ormsby, M. Sait \u00d6zervarl\u0131, and Hidemi Takahashi.","btype":4,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004290952 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":861,"full_name":"Georges Tamer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5286,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies","volume":"94","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Understanding the Qur’anic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age (Signifying [on] Scriptures) |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Publication Place | University Park, Pennsylvania |
| Publisher | The Pennsylvania State University Press |
| Categories | Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Isra Yazicioglu |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Understanding the Qurʾanic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age explores the ways in which meaningful implications have been drawn from stories of miracles in the Qurʾan. Isra Yazicioglu describes the fascinating medieval Muslim debate over miracles and connects its insights with early and late modern turning points in Western thought and with contemporary Qurʾanic interpretation. Building on an apparent tension within the Qurʾan and analyzing crucial cases of classical and modern Muslim engagement with these miracle stories, she illustrates how an apparent site of conflict between faith and reason, or revelation and science, can lead to fruitful exchange. A distinctive contribution to a new trend in Qurʾanic studies, this volume reveals the presence of insightful Qurʾanic interpretation outside of the traditional line-by-line commentary genre, engaging with the works of Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, and Said Nursi. Scholars of Islam, philosophy, and the intersection of science and religion will especially want to engage with Yazicioglu’s study. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5257","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5257,"authors_free":[{"id":6066,"entry_id":5257,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Isra Yazicioglu","free_first_name":"Isra","free_last_name":"Yazicioglu","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Understanding the Qur\u2019anic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age (Signifying [on] Scriptures)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Understanding the Qur\u2019anic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age (Signifying [on] Scriptures)"},"abstract":"Understanding the Qur\u02beanic Miracle Stories in the Modern Age explores the ways in which meaningful implications have been drawn from stories of miracles in the Qur\u02bean. Isra Yazicioglu describes the fascinating medieval Muslim debate over miracles and connects its insights with early and late modern turning points in Western thought and with contemporary Qur\u02beanic interpretation. Building on an apparent tension within the Qur\u02bean and analyzing crucial cases of classical and modern Muslim engagement with these miracle stories, she illustrates how an apparent site of conflict between faith and reason, or revelation and science, can lead to fruitful exchange.\r\n\r\nA distinctive contribution to a new trend in Qur\u02beanic studies, this volume reveals the presence of insightful Qur\u02beanic interpretation outside of the traditional line-by-line commentary genre, engaging with the works of Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, and Said Nursi. Scholars of Islam, philosophy, and the intersection of science and religion will especially want to engage with Yazicioglu\u2019s study.","btype":1,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5257,"pubplace":"University Park, Pennsylvania","publisher":"The Pennsylvania State University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averroè |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | L'averroismo in età moderna (1400–1700) |
| Pages | 125–144 |
| Categories | Theology, Agostino Nifo, al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Guido Giglioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2010,"authors_free":[{"id":2451,"entry_id":2010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1479,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Guido Giglioni","free_first_name":"Guido","free_last_name":"Giglioni","norm_person":{"id":1479,"first_name":"Guido","last_name":"Giglioni","full_name":"Guido Giglioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1060847221","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51822941","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guido Giglioni"}}],"entry_title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":59,"category_name":"Agostino Nifo","link":"bib?categories[]=Agostino Nifo"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1479,"full_name":"Guido Giglioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":2010,"section_of":2007,"pages":"125\u2013144","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2007,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1811,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":null,"title":"L'averroismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":2007,"pubplace":"Macerata","publisher":"Quodlibet Studio","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":{"id":2010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"125\u2013144"}},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Al-Miklātī, a Twelfth Century Aš’arite Reader of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 155–197 |
| Categories | Proceedings, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Yamina Adouhane , Yamina Adouhane |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Abū al-Ḥağğāğ al-Miklātī (d. 1237) is an Ašʿarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Miklātī – although he never mentions his name – is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Miklātī's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Miklātī provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's “metaphysical” proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1757,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}},{"id":2028,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"},"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Ab\u016b al-\u1e24a\u011f\u011f\u0101\u011f al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b (d. 1237) is an A\u0161\u02bfarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b \u2013 although he never mentions his name \u2013 is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's \u201cmetaphysical\u201d proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095742391200001X","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":45,"category_name":"Proceedings","link":"bib?categories[]=Proceedings"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1},{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"155\u2013197"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Al-Miklātī, a Twelfth Century Aš’arite Reader of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 155–197 |
| Categories | Proceedings, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Yamina Adouhane , Yamina Adouhane |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Abū al-Ḥağğāğ al-Miklātī (d. 1237) is an Ašʿarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Miklātī – although he never mentions his name – is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Miklātī's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Miklātī provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's “metaphysical” proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1757,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}},{"id":2028,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"},"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Ab\u016b al-\u1e24a\u011f\u011f\u0101\u011f al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b (d. 1237) is an A\u0161\u02bfarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b \u2013 although he never mentions his name \u2013 is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's \u201cmetaphysical\u201d proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095742391200001X","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":45,"category_name":"Proceedings","link":"bib?categories[]=Proceedings"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1},{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"155\u2013197"}},"sort":["Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"]}
| Title | AverroesのDestructio Destructionum におけるPhysicaについて |
| Transcription | Averroes no Destructio Destructionum ni okeru Physica ni tsuite |
| Translation | About the Physica in Averroes' Destructio Destructionum |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Date | 1972 |
| Journal | Chūsei Shisō Kenkyū |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 86–95 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Physics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Chisato Tanaka |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5413","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5413,"authors_free":[{"id":6277,"entry_id":5413,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chisato Tanaka","free_first_name":"Chisato","free_last_name":"Tanaka","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u306eDestructio Destructionum \u306b\u304a\u3051\u308bPhysica\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066","title_transcript":"Averroes no Destructio Destructionum ni okeru Physica ni tsuite","title_translation":"About the Physica in Averroes' Destructio Destructionum","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u306eDestructio Destructionum \u306b\u304a\u3051\u308bPhysica\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1972","language":"Japanese","online_url":"http:\/\/jsmp.jpn.org\/jsmp_wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/smt\/vol14\/86-95_tanaka.pdf","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5413,"pubplace":"T\u014dky\u014d","publisher":"Ch\u016bsei Tetsugaku-kai","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5413,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ch\u016bsei Shis\u014d Kenky\u016b","volume":"14","issue":"","pages":"86\u201395"}},"sort":["Averroes\u306eDestructio Destructionum \u306b\u304a\u3051\u308bPhysica\u306b\u3064\u3044\u3066"]}
| Title | Averroës' Takfir of al-Ghazālī: Ta'wīl and Causal Kufr |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | American journal of Islam and society |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 60-92 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Saja Parvizian |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Ghazālı̄ famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroës claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghazālı̄ is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroës’ legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroës’ argument is that al-Ghazālı̄ has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people’s unbelief, al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever as well. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5566","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5566,"authors_free":[{"id":6460,"entry_id":5566,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saja Parvizian","free_first_name":"Saja ","free_last_name":"Parvizian","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr"},"abstract":"Al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroe\u0308s claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 argument is that al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people\u2019s unbelief, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever as well.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35632\/ajis.v38i1-2.735","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5566,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American journal of Islam and society","volume":"38","issue":"1\/2","pages":"60-92"}},"sort":["Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr"]}
| Title | El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teoría de Dios en el “Tahâfut” |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | La filosofía en Al Ándalus |
| Pages | 453–464 |
| Categories | Theology, al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Roger Arnaldez |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5187","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5187,"authors_free":[{"id":5976,"entry_id":5187,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1021,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roger Arnaldez","free_first_name":"Roger","free_last_name":"Arnaldez","norm_person":{"id":1021,"first_name":"Roger","last_name":"Arnaldez","full_name":"Roger Arnaldez","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1029497893","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51684989","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1029497893.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roger Arnaldez"}}],"entry_title":"El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teor\u00eda de Dios en el \u201cTah\u00e2fut\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teor\u00eda de Dios en el \u201cTah\u00e2fut\u201d"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1021,"full_name":"Roger Arnaldez","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5187,"section_of":5181,"pages":"453\u2013464","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5181,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"es","title":"La filosof\u00eda en Al \u00c1ndalus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"La presente obra ofrece una perspectiva abierta de la filosof\u00eda de al-Andalus con enfoques diversos y complementarios a cargo de reconocidos especialistas del arabismo, el hebra\u00edsmo y el pensamiento medieval: Miguel As\u00edn Palacios, Manuel Alonso, Roger Arnaldez, Miguel Cruz Hern\u00e1ndez, Fernando D\u00edaz Esteban, Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales, David Gonzalo Maeso, Joaqu\u00edn Lomba, Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca y Juan Vernet. Novedad importante que reflejan estas p\u00e1ginas es la integraci\u00f3n de los fil\u00f3sofos jud\u00edos y musulmanes en la casa com\u00fan de al-Andalus, como hist\u00f3ricamente aconteci\u00f3. En la primera parte se analizan las influencias cl\u00e1sicas y orientales que confluyeron en la vida intelectual de la Espa\u00f1a musulmana. En la segunda se traza un amplio y detallado panorama de los principales fil\u00f3sofos de al-Andalus. El editor ha reconstruido en la introducci\u00f3n el desarrollo del pensamiento andalus\u00ed dentro de su contexto hist\u00f3rico. Rigor hist\u00f3rico-filol\u00f3gico, contextualizaci\u00f3n social, profundizaci\u00f3n en las cuestiones especulativas y esp\u00edritu cr\u00edtico constituyen rasgos comunes de estos ensayos. Esta nueva edici\u00f3n se ampl\u00eda con un pr\u00f3logo que resume las ediciones y estudios producidos en Espa\u00f1a durante el \u00faltimo cuarto de siglo; una renovada bibliograf\u00eda b\u00e1sica acerca de las fuentes hist\u00f3ricas y literarias; y una actualizada nota biobibliogr\u00e1fica de los autores aqu\u00ed reunidos que ser\u00e1 \u00fatil a los j\u00f3venes lectores e investigadores. Cierra el libro un Ap\u00e9ndice con tres nuevos textos: un art\u00edculo del historiador de la ciencia \u00e1rabe Juan Vernet, una lograda entrevista al sabio egipcio Mahmud Ali Makki y un reciente trabajo del profesor Mart\u00ednez Lorca sobre la formaci\u00f3n de la cultura andalus\u00ed y su posterior recepci\u00f3n en la Europa latina.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5181,"pubplace":"C\u00f3rdoba","publisher":"Almuzara","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["El pensamiento religioso de Averroes. La teor\u00eda de Dios en el \u201cTah\u00e2fut\u201d"]}
| Title | Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averroè |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | L'averroismo in età moderna (1400–1700) |
| Pages | 125–144 |
| Categories | Theology, Agostino Nifo, al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Guido Giglioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2010,"authors_free":[{"id":2451,"entry_id":2010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1479,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Guido Giglioni","free_first_name":"Guido","free_last_name":"Giglioni","norm_person":{"id":1479,"first_name":"Guido","last_name":"Giglioni","full_name":"Guido Giglioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1060847221","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51822941","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guido Giglioni"}}],"entry_title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":59,"category_name":"Agostino Nifo","link":"bib?categories[]=Agostino Nifo"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1479,"full_name":"Guido Giglioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":2010,"section_of":2007,"pages":"125\u2013144","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2007,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1811,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":null,"title":"L'averroismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":2007,"pubplace":"Macerata","publisher":"Quodlibet Studio","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":{"id":2010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"125\u2013144"}},"sort":["Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh’arism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Research |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 82-97 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Orhan Atalay |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5335","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5335,"authors_free":[{"id":6181,"entry_id":5335,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Orhan Atalay","free_first_name":"Orhan ","free_last_name":"Atalay","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5335,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Research","volume":"3","issue":"2 ","pages":" 82-97"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd, "The incoherence of the incoherence" |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2005 |
| Published in | Medieval Islamic philosophical writings |
| Pages | XXXIV-XL, 155-180 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Muhammad Ali Khalidi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5554","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5554,"authors_free":[{"id":6448,"entry_id":5554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":888,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","free_first_name":"Muhammad Ali","free_last_name":"Khalidi","norm_person":{"id":888,"first_name":"Muhammad Ali","last_name":"Khalidi","full_name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1072486083","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/14904121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Muhammad Ali Khalidi"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd, \"The incoherence of the incoherence\"","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd, \"The incoherence of the incoherence\""},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2005","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511811050.009","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":888,"full_name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5554,"section_of":5553,"pages":"XXXIV-XL, 155-180","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5553,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Medieval Islamic philosophical writings","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2005","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Philosophy in the Islamic world emerged in the ninth century and continued to flourish into the fourteenth century. It was strongly influenced by Greek thought, but Islamic philosophers also developed an original philosophical culture of their own, which had a considerable impact on the subsequent course of Western philosophy. This volume offers new translations of philosophical writings by Farabi, Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Ghazali, Ibn Tufayl, and Ibn Rushd (Averroes). All of the texts presented here were very influential and invite comparison with later works in the Western tradition. They focus on metaphysics and epistemology but also contribute to broader debates concerning the conception of God, the nature of religion, the place of humanity in the universe, and the limits of human reason. A historical and philosophical introduction sets the writings in context and traces their preoccupations and their achievement.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511811050","book":{"id":5553,"pubplace":"Cambridge ","publisher":"Cambridge University Press ","series":"Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6447,"entry_id":5553,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":888,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","free_first_name":"Muhammad Ali","free_last_name":"Khalidi","norm_person":{"id":888,"first_name":"Muhammad Ali","last_name":"Khalidi","full_name":"Muhammad Ali Khalidi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1072486083","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/14904121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Ibn Rushd, \"The incoherence of the incoherence\""]}
| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":["Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"]}
| Title | Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghazâlî. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1 |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies |
| Volume | 94 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Georges Tamer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume offers an account of Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1111) as a rational theologian who created a symbiosis of philosophy and theology and infused rationality into Sufism. The majority of the papers herein deal with important topics of al-Ghazālī’s work, which demonstrate his rational treatment of the Qurʾān and major subjects of Islamic theology and everyday life of Muslims. Some other contributions address al-Ghazālī’s sources and how his intellectual endeavors were later received by scholars who had the same concern of reconciling religion and rationality within Islam, Christianity and Judaism. With contributions by Binyamin Abrahamov, Hans Daiber, Ken Garden, Avner Giladi, Scott Girdner, Frank Griffel, Steven Harvey, Alfred Ivry, Jules Janssens, Taneli Kukkonen, Luis Xavier López-Farjeat, Wilferd Madelung, Yahya M. Michot, Yasien Mohamed, Eric Ormsby, M. Sait Özervarlı, and Hidemi Takahashi. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5286","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5286,"authors_free":[{"id":6105,"entry_id":5286,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":861,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Georges Tamer","free_first_name":"Georges","free_last_name":"Tamer","norm_person":{"id":861,"first_name":"Georges","last_name":"Tamer","full_name":"Georges Tamer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1056157437","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59259868","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Georges Tamer"}}],"entry_title":"Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1"},"abstract":"This volume offers an account of Ab\u016b \u1e24\u0101mid al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b (d. 505\/1111) as a rational theologian who created a symbiosis of philosophy and theology and infused rationality into Sufism. The majority of the papers herein deal with important topics of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s work, which demonstrate his rational treatment of the Qur\u02be\u0101n and major subjects of Islamic theology and everyday life of Muslims. Some other contributions address al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s sources and how his intellectual endeavors were later received by scholars who had the same concern of reconciling religion and rationality within Islam, Christianity and Judaism.\r\n\r\nWith contributions by Binyamin Abrahamov, Hans Daiber, Ken Garden, Avner Giladi, Scott Girdner, Frank Griffel, Steven Harvey, Alfred Ivry, Jules Janssens, Taneli Kukkonen, Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat, Wilferd Madelung, Yahya M. Michot, Yasien Mohamed, Eric Ormsby, M. Sait \u00d6zervarl\u0131, and Hidemi Takahashi.","btype":4,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004290952 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":861,"full_name":"Georges Tamer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5286,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies","volume":"94","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Islam and Rationality: The Impact of al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee. Papers Collected on His 900th Anniversary Vol. 1"]}
| Title | La risposta di Averroé alla XIV quaestio del « Tahafut » di Ghazālī intorno al movimento celeste |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1979 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 497-507 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Physics, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Giulio A. Lucchetta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43060777 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5713","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5713,"authors_free":[{"id":6621,"entry_id":5713,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1880,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","free_first_name":"Giulio A. ","free_last_name":"Lucchetta","norm_person":{"id":1880,"first_name":"Giulio A. ","last_name":"Lucchetta","full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204033293","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giulio A. Lucchetta"}}],"entry_title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1979","language":"Italian","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43060777","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1880,"full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5713,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica","volume":"71","issue":"3","pages":" 497-507"}},"sort":["La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"]}